Why not just make two books into three?

I came up with a brilliant idea last week and have been completely caught up in working on it.  My writing group made a suggestion in one of her critiques and I’m just going with it now.  (Have I mentioned how good she is?)  So…her suggestion, my idea?  That doesn’t seem fair to her.  So her idea.  But still my writing!  And honestly.  I had to come up with all the hows and whys.  That certainly wasn’t easy.  But just looking at what’s out there as far as books go, I realized that I really needed to do this character justice and what I have now just isn’t doing that.

What’s really entertaining is that it’s going to turn my two book project into a three book project.  The dreaded trilogy.  I always have a little disdain for the trilogy because it’s rare that any of the books can stand on their own.  I suppose that I’ll have to work extra hard to make certain that these can.  The first one should be able to–it’s the middle one I’m most concerned about.  And I love the beginning pages of the current novel (which will be turned into the second novel) so I want to keep those as the first novel, but that means writing a whole new beginning for the second novel and that just won’t work because it ruins the whole set up that I had going on there…  So I decided that I would sit down and just try writing a new opening for the first novel.  Just to see–then I could use it if I wanted.  I sat for thirty minutes in front of a blank screen.  Quite pathetic.  I used to adore writing beginnings.  Loved it.  Would come up with first sentences of novels that would rival any Bulwer-Lytton winner.  And now?  Nothing.  I started and deleted about a hundred times.

On another topic, I’ve finished with both Enid and Beatrice (who actually turned out to be pretty entertaining) and am on to William and John.  Will’s a real pill.  Wretchedly full of himself.  John’s so-so.  He hasn’t amazed me yet…I’m still waiting.

Ego boosters!

My writing group (of one) called up yesterday to give me the update on what she thought of the novel.  The simple fact that she’s having to remind herself constantly that I wrote it in high school is troublesome enough.  But apparently, my writing is so horrible that she realized that she could write something much better and came up with an idea of her own!  Ha!

OK.  So not fair.  This is the whole point of a writing group.  I’m super excited that she has such a great idea and I feel a little bit responsible, so that’s nice.  And I know all the work that has to go into mine.  I just hope that I’ve improved recently.  Really.  Is the stuff I’m writing now that bad?  Oh…the doubt.

Review of Books About Jesters and Fools

My initial research for my jester novel has focused on nonfiction books about jesters and fools. When I get overwhelmed with that (or start to nod off), I head over to the vast fiction collection that I’ve amassed to cheer myself up.

The Fool by Enid Welsford

The Fool by Enid Welsford book cover a book about jesters and foolsAdmittedly, Enid Welsford and her book The Fool: His Social and Literary History lost me a bit along the way. I finished the book and will probably re-read several parts I’ve marked again simply because I found them so useful and entertaining, but especially because the last few chapters completely bewildered me. Throughout the book, she would re-tell portions of allegorical plays and stories that completely charmed me and provided plenty of historical and social significances, and then she never offered any explanation as to how they related to her thesis. Or none that I was understanding anyway (hence the re-reading).

I also felt like her treatment of King Lear’s fool was a surprisingly limited. I really thought she’d get into it with him, especially since he seems like the seminal fool in literature.

And just a warning–there are no in-text translations. It was entertaining at first, but trying to read quotes in Middle English and French is hard enough for me without trying to figure out the point analytically. And then (because I’m OK with looking up the occasional French word–I admit it, my French is NOT 100%) when I looked up a word with which I wasn’t familiar, my dictionary would point out that it is a Middle French word.

Fools Are Everywhere by Beatrice Otto

Fools Are Everywhere by Beatrice Otto book cover books about jesters and fools

Initially I was frustrated by Fools Are Everywhere: The Court Jester Around the World by Beatrice Otto, but she eventually she won me over. My initial reaction to her point that no one has paid any attention to the Chinese jesters out there was annoyance because it felt like she wasn’t going to discuss any of the jesters and fools elsewhere. But then she starts comparing and contrasting and gives a fascinating description of exactly how and why these amazing fools are everywhere. Even in today’s society.

My favorite story that both Welsford’s and Otto’s books refer to is an example of “verse capping” between Will Somers and Henry VIII. The king makes some mention of his mistress in a tower, expecting Will to respond. In her book, Enid charmingly titters and blushes and points out that the response Will gives is not really appropriate for her kind of scholarly effort, and the real point is how Will eventually shuts Cardinal Wolsey down by verse capping him. (I love this verse capping thing–kind of like rap battles. I’m hoping I’m clever enough to come up with some of my own for my novel…) Beatrice, to my relief, gives us the entire exchange. (Not to give it away, but Will makes mention of the mistress farting–this is apparently what offends poor Enid so much.)

Scholarly Debate in Books About Jesters and Fools

The most interesting aspect is the drama played out between Beatrice, Enid and Karl Friedrich Flögel. Well. Maybe not so much drama, considering these are books about fools…

Flögel wrote a book back in 1789 called Geschichte der Hofnarren. My German being non-existent (and Enid, naturally, refusing to translate anything), I had to look it up to discover that it means “History of Jesters.” I can’t find a translation of the entire book anywhere, unfortunately. The thing about it that really amuses me is that it was published by “Liegnitz und Leipzig.” (I don’t know why. Makes me giggle for some reason. All I can think of is Will Farrell in The Producers.)

Ms. Welsford gets a bit snippy with Flögel. She quotes him enough and uses his book fairly frequently, but is always criticizing his opinions and can’t seem to verify any of his primary sources. This is her footnote concerning him:

This work [Geschichte der Hofnarren] is valuable but has to be used with caution. Sometimes Flögel gives his references in a very inconvenient form. He does not discriminate carefully enough between ‘fools’ and other kinds of ‘comic actors’. Much of his work is irrelevant and uncritical. (The Fool, p 343)

Burn! Wow. If she had delivered that as verse capping, I would really be impressed.

So we have Enid’s opinion of Flögel. Ms. Otto, on the other hand, gives us quite another take. She makes mention that it was only after the disappearance of jesters in European society did writers start to take a critical interest in them:

The seminal work, which has yet to be surpassed, is Karl Flögel’s Geschichte der Hofnarren (1789), the source from which many subsequent works spring. It is as readable and relevant today as it was in the eighteenth century, lacking any old-fashioned quaintness. The only work to equal Flögel is Enid Welsford’s The Fool: His Social and Literary History, published in 1935. (Fools Are Everywhere, Prologue, xxii)

Enid might take offense at that. Then again, she might not.

Other Books About Jesters and Fools

I managed to find a book called The History of Court Fools by the English author John Doran. It’s up next in the queue, so I’m not able to provide any information on it yet. I’m fascinated, however, especially since the source A First Sketch of English Literature by Henry Morley and Edward William Edmunds claims “the best part of its contents [were] borrowed, without proper acknowledgement” (p. 1050) from Flögel’s book. Maybe that will cover me with Flögel.

I also read John Southworth’s Fools and Jesters at the English Court and have started William Willeford’s The Fool and His Scepter: A Study of Clowns and Jesters and Their Audience. Southworth was interesting and used more of a personal take on most of his conclusions, which is nice. However, I found that much of what he was discussing I already knew, so I would recommend this book as a starting point if you just want a quick overview. Willeford is a bit too philosophical–and takes himself too seriously for me, so I’m not enjoying his book as much. Even Enid was able to laugh at herself at times and refer to donning the “cap and bells.”

Remember, we’re writing about fools. It’s OK to laugh.