Review of Books About Jesters and Fools

My initial research for my jester novel has focused on nonfiction books about jesters and fools. When I get overwhelmed with that (or start to nod off), I head over to the vast fiction collection that I’ve amassed to cheer myself up.

The Fool by Enid Welsford

The Fool by Enid Welsford book cover a book about jesters and foolsAdmittedly, Enid Welsford and her book The Fool: His Social and Literary History lost me a bit along the way. I finished the book and will probably re-read several parts I’ve marked again simply because I found them so useful and entertaining, but especially because the last few chapters completely bewildered me. Throughout the book, she would re-tell portions of allegorical plays and stories that completely charmed me and provided plenty of historical and social significances, and then she never offered any explanation as to how they related to her thesis. Or none that I was understanding anyway (hence the re-reading).

I also felt like her treatment of King Lear’s fool was a surprisingly limited. I really thought she’d get into it with him, especially since he seems like the seminal fool in literature.

And just a warning–there are no in-text translations. It was entertaining at first, but trying to read quotes in Middle English and French is hard enough for me without trying to figure out the point analytically. And then (because I’m OK with looking up the occasional French word–I admit it, my French is NOT 100%) when I looked up a word with which I wasn’t familiar, my dictionary would point out that it is a Middle French word.

Fools Are Everywhere by Beatrice Otto

Fools Are Everywhere by Beatrice Otto book cover books about jesters and fools

Initially I was frustrated by Fools Are Everywhere: The Court Jester Around the World by Beatrice Otto, but she eventually she won me over. My initial reaction to her point that no one has paid any attention to the Chinese jesters out there was annoyance because it felt like she wasn’t going to discuss any of the jesters and fools elsewhere. But then she starts comparing and contrasting and gives a fascinating description of exactly how and why these amazing fools are everywhere. Even in today’s society.

My favorite story that both Welsford’s and Otto’s books refer to is an example of “verse capping” between Will Somers and Henry VIII. The king makes some mention of his mistress in a tower, expecting Will to respond. In her book, Enid charmingly titters and blushes and points out that the response Will gives is not really appropriate for her kind of scholarly effort, and the real point is how Will eventually shuts Cardinal Wolsey down by verse capping him. (I love this verse capping thing–kind of like rap battles. I’m hoping I’m clever enough to come up with some of my own for my novel…) Beatrice, to my relief, gives us the entire exchange. (Not to give it away, but Will makes mention of the mistress farting–this is apparently what offends poor Enid so much.)

Scholarly Debate in Books About Jesters and Fools

The most interesting aspect is the drama played out between Beatrice, Enid and Karl Friedrich Flögel. Well. Maybe not so much drama, considering these are books about fools…

Flögel wrote a book back in 1789 called Geschichte der Hofnarren. My German being non-existent (and Enid, naturally, refusing to translate anything), I had to look it up to discover that it means “History of Jesters.” I can’t find a translation of the entire book anywhere, unfortunately. The thing about it that really amuses me is that it was published by “Liegnitz und Leipzig.” (I don’t know why. Makes me giggle for some reason. All I can think of is Will Farrell in The Producers.)

Ms. Welsford gets a bit snippy with Flögel. She quotes him enough and uses his book fairly frequently, but is always criticizing his opinions and can’t seem to verify any of his primary sources. This is her footnote concerning him:

This work [Geschichte der Hofnarren] is valuable but has to be used with caution. Sometimes Flögel gives his references in a very inconvenient form. He does not discriminate carefully enough between ‘fools’ and other kinds of ‘comic actors’. Much of his work is irrelevant and uncritical. (The Fool, p 343)

Burn! Wow. If she had delivered that as verse capping, I would really be impressed.

So we have Enid’s opinion of Flögel. Ms. Otto, on the other hand, gives us quite another take. She makes mention that it was only after the disappearance of jesters in European society did writers start to take a critical interest in them:

The seminal work, which has yet to be surpassed, is Karl Flögel’s Geschichte der Hofnarren (1789), the source from which many subsequent works spring. It is as readable and relevant today as it was in the eighteenth century, lacking any old-fashioned quaintness. The only work to equal Flögel is Enid Welsford’s The Fool: His Social and Literary History, published in 1935. (Fools Are Everywhere, Prologue, xxii)

Enid might take offense at that. Then again, she might not.

Other Books About Jesters and Fools

I managed to find a book called The History of Court Fools by the English author John Doran. It’s up next in the queue, so I’m not able to provide any information on it yet. I’m fascinated, however, especially since the source A First Sketch of English Literature by Henry Morley and Edward William Edmunds claims “the best part of its contents [were] borrowed, without proper acknowledgement” (p. 1050) from Flögel’s book. Maybe that will cover me with Flögel.

I also read John Southworth’s Fools and Jesters at the English Court and have started William Willeford’s The Fool and His Scepter: A Study of Clowns and Jesters and Their Audience. Southworth was interesting and used more of a personal take on most of his conclusions, which is nice. However, I found that much of what he was discussing I already knew, so I would recommend this book as a starting point if you just want a quick overview. Willeford is a bit too philosophical–and takes himself too seriously for me, so I’m not enjoying his book as much. Even Enid was able to laugh at herself at times and refer to donning the “cap and bells.”

Remember, we’re writing about fools. It’s OK to laugh.

Complete Review of The Fool by Enid Welsford

My review of The Fool by Enid Welsford includes my first introduction to the hardcore history of fools and jesters. Did you know that in ancient Greece, funny people used to just hang out around the baths, waiting for the popular rich people to come by and invite them to parties? They’d get a free meal out of it, most likely a swank place to stay for the night, hang out with some other rich people, and all they had to do was make asses of themselves.

Then there were the philosophers who would pretty much just gate-crash for the same reason. Sure, they weren’t invited, but they were entertaining, so no one complained too much if they ate all the marinated nightingales. Sounds a little bit like parties I’ve been to in LA. The drunken idiot making a fool of himself gives everyone someone to laugh at, so when you do something drunk and stupid, hardly anyone notices… Yep. I think I’ve been that person before, too…

My Review of The Fool by Enid Welsford

The Fool by Enid Welsford book cover included in my complete review of The Fool by Enid WelsfordI’ve finished reading The Fool: His Social and Literary History by Enid Welsford, first published in 1935. It’s a fairly really entertaining dissertation–and not just because it’s about jesters and fools (which, honestly, you’d have to be a pretty boring writer to ruin that topic). Enid’s got a snappy sense of humor. She delves into some crazy speculation about the fool as poet and clairvoyant towards the end of one chapter, and ends by saying that she won’t go further on the topic. “But here I must bring my conjectures to a close lest I, also, aspiring to clairvoyance, attain to the cap and bells.” (Wow. Do I need to footnote that in a blog?) I mean, that’s funny stuff!

My other favorite part of this book so far? In her introduction, she’s pointing out that the fool has always interacted with an audience. Which is true. Her concern? Charlie Chaplin. He doesn’t have an audience. He doesn’t know if he’s being funny or not and can’t feed off of the laughter or comments. She’s afraid that with the new dawn of movies and the silver screen, the fool will disappear forever. I hope she didn’t lose too much sleep over it, because her fools are alive and well and living in LA.

I want my million dollar cabin.

Just finished reading an article about Nora Roberts in the New Yorker.

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/22/090622fa_fact_collins

Impressive.  Not that Nora Roberts is a favorite author of mine (although I have been known to read one of her books while visiting my sister), but her work ethic is amazing.  Writing for that many hours a day?  Doing her own research?  (Although that I can totally see–doing research is one of my favorite things to do.)  And sixty million dollars a year?  Wow.  I suppose I don’t need sixty million…six million should do me nicely.  Ha.  But what I’m really envious of is the job.  She gets up and goes to work in her office doing what she loves to do.  And then at five she stops and cooks dinner.  One of the parts that I laughed at the most in the article was when her friends suggested that she hire a cook or assistant, and she protested, saying that if there were people around, then she’d have to talk to them.  Exactly.

I mentioned the article to my sister and she mentioned that she’s getting a little bored with Nora these days.  She made the point that NO ONE could have 180 different ideas for books–things have to start repeating.  Then she brought up Margaret Mitchell who only had one good book and that was all she needed.  True.  They’re on completely different ends of the spectrum.  Mitchell spent the rest of her life answering fan mail.  Not sure I’d want to do that, but the happy medium that most writers seem to attain would work for me.